By continuing to browse our site you agree to our use of cookies, revised Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.
CHOOSE YOUR LANGUAGE
CHOOSE YOUR LANGUAGE
互联网新闻信息许可证10120180008
Disinformation report hotline: 010-85061466
指南针为什么不叫指北针 | 小学教师需要什么学历 | 心度高血压是什么意思 | 醋酸面料是什么 | 百家姓第一个姓是什么 |
敏感肌是什么意思 | 感染hpv吃什么药 | 肉苁蓉是什么 | 开字五行属什么 | 侍郎是什么官 |
椭圆机是什么 | 头晕是什么原因引起 | 心脏t波改变吃什么药 | 57是什么意思 | 铁蛋白高吃什么药能降下来 |
一致是什么意思 | 性激素六项什么时候查 | 水色是什么颜色 | 在农村做什么 | 神经性呕吐是什么症状 |
阿司匹林不能和什么药一起吃hcv8jop3ns0r.cn | 三楼属于五行属什么bjhyzcsm.com | 突然全身抽搐是什么病hcv8jop1ns8r.cn | 茄子吃多了有什么坏处hcv8jop9ns6r.cn | 唔该是什么意思hcv9jop5ns0r.cn |
花胶和什么煲汤最适合hcv8jop0ns0r.cn | 碳酸钠是什么hcv9jop5ns6r.cn | 3月1号是什么星座hcv8jop0ns2r.cn | 二甲医院是什么级别chuanglingweilai.com | 为什么没有广东大学1949doufunao.com |
tnt是什么hcv9jop8ns1r.cn | 中央型肺ca是什么意思hcv7jop5ns6r.cn | 起风疹的原因是什么引起的hcv8jop0ns3r.cn | 什么背什么腰hcv8jop7ns9r.cn | u盘什么牌子好hcv9jop3ns7r.cn |
sca是什么意思hcv9jop7ns2r.cn | 急性扁桃体炎吃什么药adwl56.com | 阖闾和夫差是什么关系hcv9jop6ns2r.cn | 为什么会出现彩虹hcv9jop1ns7r.cn | 唯有女子与小人难养也什么意思hcv8jop6ns9r.cn |
Tesla logo /VCG
A Florida jury on Friday ordered Tesla to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to plaintiffs who blamed a deadly 2019 crash on the company's "Autopilot" driver assistance technology.
The jury found Tesla's system partly responsible for a crash in Key Largo that killed Naibel Benavides Leon and injured her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, according to attorney Darren Jeffrey Rousso, a partner at the law firm that represented Angulo and Leon's family.
The plaintiffs had alleged that Autopilot was to blame when driver George McGee's Tesla careened into a Chevrolet sport utility vehicle, killing Leon and injuring Angulo.
The jury awarded $200 million in punitive damages, plus $59 million in compensatory damages to Leon's family and $70 million in damages to Angulo, according to court records.
Since the jury assigned one-third of the blame to Tesla, the compensatory damages will be reduced, Rousso said, with the total impact of the jury award totaling $242 million after these reductions.
"Justice was done," Rousso said. "The jury heard all the evidence and came up with a fair and just verdict on behalf of our clients."
Tesla will appeal the decision, according to its defense attorneys.
"Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology," Tesla said through its legal team.
"The evidence has always shown that this driver was solely at fault because he was speeding, with his foot on the accelerator – which overrode Autopilot – as he rummaged for his dropped phone without his eyes on the road," Tesla said.
"To be clear, no car in 2019, and none today, would have prevented this crash. This was never about Autopilot."